Why US should not "relent" in the war?

Q: Why should we "will not relent" and should hunt down the bad guys "one at a time if necessary" over there instead of planning a withdraw? Is it because somebody in the government is more resolved than others?

A: No. It simply because that it is the most time consuming way to end this war, if ever, thus the best way to prolong the sweetheart contract with Harlliburton.

"War" vs "struggle"

When I demand something from you, like votes, military expense, trust, etc, it's a seriously sounding war.

When you ask something for return, like accountability, progress reports, etc, then it's a more vaguely defined struggle.

After all, a 'struggle against global violent extreme time president' title doesn't get you as many votes as a "wartime prez" did.

This just in: Hey, give me back my war! Haven't done milking it just yet! If you want to mess up people's minds by renaming things, go make up your own excuses and start your own damn war!